You are here: Home > Health > Gop Claims Health Care Plan Is Merely Camouflage

Gop Claims Health Care Plan Is Merely Camouflage

4605682805 553d36e310 m Gop Claims Health Care Plan Is Merely Camouflage

The White House issued proposals Monday for health care reform that have won kudos from several Democratic lawmakers, a sure sign, say Republicans, of how little GOP input is in the plan.

Republicans have agreed to show up at the White House Thursday for a summit on health care, but are heading there with a dim view of the outcome.

“It’s disappointing that Democrats in Washington either aren’t listening, or are completely ignoring what Americans across the country have been saying,” U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a written statement.

“House Republicans welcome any good faith effort to start over on health care reform but the bill President Obama unveiled today is just more of the same government-run insurance, mandates and taxes the American people have overwhelmingly rejected,” added Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind.

The White House, however, insists that the bill is more than just camouflage, but rather represents compromise.

“Senator McCain in the campaign had a proposal to add — to add those dependents on to your parents’ health care up to a certain age to allow for what is a gap in the uninsured based on when someone leaves the dependency of their parents and gets a job that provides health care,” said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, noting that provision has been included in the president’s proposals.

Gibbs argued that 160 Republican amendments were included in varying pieces of legislation that made its way through the House and Senate.

“Inexplicably, all those ideas weren’t good enough,” he said.

Indeed in its effort to appear bipartisan, the White House included in its health care proposals listed on its Web site a section on Republican initiatives that were included in the legislation passed by Congress and included in the president’s latest plan.

Among them were provisions to allow health insurance premiums to vary based on participation in employer wellness programs, grants to states to evaluate medical liability reform ideas, automatic enrollment by employers in health insurance and ability for employees to opt-out.

Watch the video related to health care

All of the other Nations with universal health care systems are not on the verge of Bankruptcy. We are… In fact we owe them money because our own Federal reserve can’t even print enough money for this government to spend. We have problems to fix before we create more for future generations Health care, Social Security, Medicaid, David Walker, 60 minutes, Vote Ron Paul!

Help answer the question about health care

Do the old consume too much health care?How should health care resources be distributed across the population?
What are each generations obligations to those before and those after them? Do the old consume too much health care? What is too much? How should health care resources be distributed across the population? Should health care be explicitly rationed on the basis of age?

Related Post

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

18 Responses to “Gop Claims Health Care Plan Is Merely Camouflage”

  1. Ashley A says:

    Okay if you won't have any clinical skills or any managerial/administration skills, just what will you do? You'll have a lot of knowledge but nothing to do with it.

  2. 066275082 says:

    u have to go to trontaro canada its faster

  3. phillip84109 says:

    @ZakkiLewis Wow. All you can do is hurl insults because you don’t have any facts on your side.

  4. b t says:

    First of all health care is a provincial responsibility so it depends on the rules of her province. In Ontario she has to reside in ON for at least half the year to be covered by the ON health plan. It would be prudent to check this out.

    Marriage would not affect her citizenship.

  5. bones5737 says:

    you dipshit reps would do/say anything to try and make dems look bad, including trying to go to a health clinic on sunday, when anyone can tell you, NO health clinics are open on sunday. Not in Canada, not in the States, NO WHERE. Grow up and stop trying to feed of of ppls partisanship and short-sightedness. oh btw, you ever been to an ER in the states? I had a broken leg and waited 6 hours just to be rebroken and billed a few grand. do the real world a favor, drop off of daddy’s inurance, ass.

  6. jackiephitien says:

    what is the future of health care?

    what diseases do we need to be aware of?

    how do i stay healthy?

    where do i turn if a loved one is diagnosed with a serious illness?

  7. lakers.chick24 says:

    I'm from California & I'm not sure about your question, but I'll say some stuff I know. Half of my relatives are in Canada & although I'm poor, several of my Canadian Uncles, Cousins, etc., are doing quite well financially. Every one of them LOVE the health care in Canada & look with disgust at the USA. Health care in America is much more expensive & less available because it is a FOR PROFIT industry. Drugs are extremely overpriced & the insurance companies care about your health as much as they care about the stuff they just expelled into their toilets. They will DENY you coverage on anything. All they need to do is find an excuse to drop you, that is, when you make a claim. They've got the most educated lawyers who do nothing but try to save the Insurance companies money. We are the most backward "First World" country on this planet morally in regards to caring about it's own citizens. Here is a site to look into. & there are many more on the internet. http://www.pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_faq.php If you're mostly concerned about Canada's situation, keep looking on the web. I'm sure you'll find something. And remember, insurance companies are only concerned with profit!

  8. SpaceBear says:

    They have a 100 percent covered plan for them and their families for life (assuming they serve at least 6 years), along with an excellent pension plan for life.

    They will care about the crisis if it is something the voters want! After all, if they are not acting in the interest of the voters, they will lose their seat and their health care plan.

    Unfortunately, there is so much disagreement between the "left" and the "right" that it is difficult for congress to do anything. In addition, many people (even those who truly need health care reforms) vote based on moral values, leaving health care to be ignored.

  9. XPeachezNCreamX says:

    only americans would like this video ..

  10. mapleleafs003 says:

    Maybe before you shit on my country, you should look at both sides of the story. I hope you enjoy the soup kitchen line up. While I sit at home eating a steak in my “socialized” country.

  11. zook101 says:

    OMGZ! SOCIALIZED IS A SCARY WORD THAT MEANS PURE EVIL! I will now trust a man who wrapped his legs around and kissed the head of John Goodman.

  12. OptimusElite says:

    @MadHabber93 Well, if Canadians decide to spend there money on healthcare for everyone, i guess that it’s there choice.

  13. Ro$e says:

    What is going to happen is the Government is going to set the rates doctors can charge for services. Doctors cannot afford the rates so they will overbook people to get the most money they can so you will go to the Dr office and wait for several hours and maybe even have to return the next day. Dr groups will get bigger and overbooking will be even more and waiting will be longer. Just think of going to the Dr and there being 100 patients in the waiting room to see a Dr.

  14. C.S. says:

    Depends on the perspective. The "socialized" (please use in quotation marks) perspective is that users of health care are the community as a whole; thus, 'just' is defined as minimizing the losing individuals. "Free market's" views are that the users are individuals or groups of individuals; thus, 'just' is defined as maximizing the number of individuals 'satisfied.'

    From both common political and ethical perspective, a child is often unable to contribute to the discussion of 'individuals to be lost' in "socialized health care" or 'user satisfaction' in the "free market." Given the assumptions that pediatric care is satisfactory for most children, "socialized health care" is more just because the intrinsic cost-of-life-saved would then be higher even though some children would fall through the cracks. HOWEVER, given the assumption above and also that the income difference between the richest and poorest people is minimal, the "free market" is more just because parents can decide what is most 'satisfactory' without too much undue financial burden.

  15. The Don says:

    The Robert Woods Johnson Foundation is a research think tank. They have all kinds of references to interesting research around health care and health reform. With a little digging, you may be able to contact some of the researchers.

    WebMD is another useful source for anything and everything health care.

    Centers for disease control and prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/

    National Vital statistics system: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss

  16. DrMinParaguay says:

    Everything is Free!! Yes I believe! My only concern is who is going to pay the Tooth Fairy?

  17. MadHabber93 says:

    @OptimusElite Fair question. First, we don’t see it as taking it from me & giving it to someone who doesn’t deserve it. Almost all Canadians see healthcare as a right, therefore, we all deserve it. Now taking from me & giving welfare to someone who doesn’t want to work, that’s different. Not saying welfare isn’t needed,but some just milk the system. However,someone shouldn’t be penalized because they have a job that doesn’t pay them enough to afford insurance. The cost is bigger in the U.S. btw.

  18. ?????? says:

    Yes. If you have unlimited resources as an American you have the best health care in the world. If you are an ordinary citizen you simply don't. Even the average health care plan generally does not cover the basics like European systems do. All too often Americans find out just how under insured they are when sickness strikes.
    http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/In-the-Literature/2008/Jun/How-Many-Are-Underinsured–Trends-Among-U-S–Adults–2003-and-2007.aspx
    That's important because when those people are lucky enough to stay healthy they will never see a problem whatsoever just as their fellow countrymen were just fine with their coverage before tradgedy happened.
    http://www.click2houston.com/investigates/12538706/detail.html
    http://www.guaranteedhealthcare.org/your_story/my-insurance-company-denied-my-doctors-prescription
    http://www.rhonawaxman.com/blog/insurance-company-medical-exam-denied-me-surgery.html
    This is the same thing as with the standard of living. Americans have a higher income on average than Americans but more detailed data shows it's the top 1 percent income earners that's responsible for the whole difference. Middle clas an poor Americans are much worse of than their European counterparts

    That's ultimately what it is about

Leave a Reply